Eastern States Petroleum Corporation, a Corporation of the State of Delaware v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum
(Based Upon an Oral Statement Made in Open Court January 7, 1959, Upon Conclusion of the Oral Argument of Counsel)
Before Prettyman, Chief Judge of the Circuit.
The matter before me is a motion for leave to file an application for an order designating two judges to complete a District Court of three judges to hear a motion for review. 1 It is presented to me as Chief Judge of the Circuit. The motion for leave to file seems a rather complicated procedure, but in this instance I am inclined to agree with counsel that it serves to separate and simplify the issues.
As I understand it, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- California Water Service Co. v. City of ReddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Donald H. Jacobs, Doing Business as the Jacobs Instrument Company v. J. Millard Tawes, Comptroller of the Treasury, State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Wicks v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployeesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Eastern States Petroleum Corporation v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Miller v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Bell v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Landry v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
- United States v. StevensonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.