State v. Dearman
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Agid, A.C.J.
The State appeals the trial court’s order suppressing evidence seized from Ivan Dearman’s home with a search warrant obtained after police used a narcotics dog to determine whether there was a marijuana grow operation in the garage. Dearman cross-appeals, contending the trial court erred in determining that police had a legitimate investigative reason to be at his residence even after they determined no one was there. Because using a trained narcotics dog to detect marijuana in the garage adjacent to a private residence constituted a search under State v. Young, 1 a search warrant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. KaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BolandWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. SeagullWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. ChrismanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. OrtizNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- State v. GuillenArizona Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KonoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.