Legal Opinion

State v. Dearman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 14, 1998No. 40522-5-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Agid, A.C.J.

The State appeals the trial court’s order suppressing evidence seized from Ivan Dearman’s home with a search warrant obtained after police used a narcotics dog to determine whether there was a marijuana grow operation in the garage. Dearman cross-appeals, contending the trial court erred in determining that police had a legitimate investigative reason to be at his residence even after they determined no one was there. Because using a trained narcotics dog to detect marijuana in the garage adjacent to a private residence constituted a search under State v. Young, 1 a search warrant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. KaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. BolandWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. SeagullWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. ChrismanWashington Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. State v. OrtizNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. State v. GuillenArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. KonoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API