Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Pro-Football, Inc., D/B/A Washington Redskins, Appellee/cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 28, 1997No. Consolidated Case 96-7222; 96-7215Published

1Opinion of the Court

127 F.3d 1111

326 U.S.App.D.C. 436

HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.

PRO-FOOTBALL, INC., d/b/a Washington Redskins,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Consolidated Case No. 96-7222.

No. 96-7215.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit

Argued Sept. 3, 1997.

Decided Oct. 28, 1997.

[326 U.S.App.D.C. 437] Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 94cv02266).

Mark E. Solomons, Washington, DC, argued the cause for appellant/cross-appellee. With him on the brief was Michael R. Goodstein, Washington, DC. Paul H. Friedman entered…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Kuwait Airways Corporation v. American Security Bank, N.A. And First American Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Geico v. Valentine FetisoffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API