United Shoe Repairing MacHine Co. v. Carney
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Hatcher, Judge:
This is an action in detinue, brought for the purpose of recovering certain machinery leased to the defendant. He filed a plea in abatement, alleging that plaintiff was a Maine corporation doing business in West Virginia without becoming domesticated as required by statute, and under Code, 31-1-79, was not entitled to sue in the courts of this state. A demurrer to the plea was sustained. Plaintiff then proceeded to trial, obtaining a verdict and judgment. Defendant prosecutes error here on the strength of his plea.
In addition to the allegations above referred to, the plea avers…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goodwin Brothers Leasing, Inc. v. NousisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Nuckols v. AtheyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
- Walter E. Heller & Co. of California v. StephensNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Blooming Rose Coal Co. v. WhiteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
- C. C. Leasing Corp. v. City of RichmondRichmond City Circuit Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.