Legal Opinion

Blooming Rose Coal Co. v. White

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1946No. CC 706, CC 707PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riley, Judge:

The sufficiency of the answers in the causes of Blooming Rose Coal Company, a corporation, against White and others, and Big Laurel Coal Company, a corporation, against Workman and others, respectively, are here on certificates from the Circuit Court of Boone County, the demurrers thereto having been sustained.

Inasmuch as the pleadings are identical in essential details, and give rise to identical issues in these causes, and having been briefed and heard .together, the recital of facts will be limited to those appearing in the pleadings in the Blooming Rose case. •

The plaintiff,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Waggoner v. WolfWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Milkint v. McNeeleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Sturm v. FlemingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Rine v. MorrisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Nicholas Land Co. v. CrowderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baird-Gatzmer Corp. v. Henry Clay Coal Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Evans v. HaleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State Ex Rel. Davis v. SimmonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Gaymont Fuel Co. v. PriceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Rosier v. McDanielWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API