Legal Opinion
Smith & Wyman Co. v. Carlsted
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 18, 1925No. 25,027PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer of the surety company to the complaint to recover on a bond executed by the surety company to secure the performance of a contract for the erection of a public school building at Waseca, Minnesota.
Plaintiff, a corporation, furnished to the contractors, Carlsted Brothers, material for the erection'of the building. There is a balance due and unpaid of $9,679.12 and interest from October 18, 1924. The complaint avers that the building was completed and accepted on October 31, 1924, and that on January 28, 1925, plaintiff served respondent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Express Co. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- National Surety Co. v. Architectural Decorating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Chandler v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Baumann v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Graybar Electric Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Guaranteed Gravel & Sand Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Nelson Roofing & Contracting, Inc. v. C. W. Moore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- City of Knoxville v. Melvin F. Burgess, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1943
- National Surety Corp. v. Michigan Fire & Marine Ins.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.