El Dorado Springs v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Judge.
This case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After careful review of the record and after oral argument, the defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part.
FACTS
The plaintiff, El Dorado Springs, a limited partnership, sought Federal assistance in financing the development of a mobile home park and applied to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, (“HUD”), for mortgage insurance pursuant to section 207 of the National Housing Act of 1937, 12 U.S.C. § 1713 (1988). The Act…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Xp Vehicles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Total Medical Management, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Freed v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Bartlomain v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.