People v. Longland
California Court of Appeal
1. Other offenses as provable in arson, note, Aim. Cas. 1915D, 174. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Defendant appeals from the judgment pronounced following her conviction of the crime of arson.
The subject of the arson was a dwelling-house situated upon a ranch located in Tulare County, owned by defendant, and which was destroyed by fire on February 26, 1919, while defendant was absent therefrom and in the state of Nevada.
The evidence upon which she was convicted is that of a confessed accomplice, Henry Ingram, and James Duffy, a detective, whose corroborative testimony, notwithstanding its questionable character, the jury within its province accepted as true.
According to Ingram’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. GlassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. LonnenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. BlunkallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- People v. KilfoilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928