People v. Blunkall
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County, and from an order denying a new trial. John F. Ellison, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The defendants were jointly charged by information duly filed in the superior court of Tehama County with the crime of grand larceny. The defendants Henry J. Blunkall and Oliver L. Blunkall were convicted of the crime so charged, and prosecute this appeal from the judgment of conviction and the order denying their motion for a new trial.
The defendant Scott, who was not on trial in this case, was made a witness for the people, and as such gave testimony against his . codefendants, the Blunkalls, and it is claimed by the latter: 1. That the verdict is not supported by the evidence, because the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. CloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. . MayhewNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- People v. MelvaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- People v. GarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. VietsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. HaugheyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.