Legal Opinion

Larabell v. Schuknecht

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1944No. Docket No. 35, Calendar No. 42,551PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiff as father of a deceased minor brought suit against Fredericka Schuknecht, herein called the defendant, and the American Bonding Company, the surety on her bond, claiming that his son’s death was due to a violation of the liquor law by the defendant who ran the tavern. Liability is claimed under Act No. 8, § 22, Pub. Acts 1933 (Ex. Sess.), as amended by Act No. 281, Pub. Acts 1937 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, § 9209-37, Stat. Ann. 1943 Cum. Supp. § 18.993). On June 28,1942, plaintiff’s decedent, almost 18 years of age, accompanied by two other young men over 21 years of age, all residing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garstka v. Republic Steel Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Jewell v. WelchMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Theophelis v. Lansing General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Geib v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Manuel v. WeitzmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Rittenhouse v. ErhartMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Boucher v. ThomsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API