Steineck v. Haas-Baruch Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GATES, J., pro tem.
This is a suit to recover money which appellant contends had been attached while in the possession of a garnishee, respondent herein. The cause was submitted to the trial court upon a written stipulation of facts.
One Simon, prior to March, 1924, was the owner of a certain grocery store, stock and fixtures. On February 28, 1924, he sold the store to E. L. Simmons and gave the customary notice of sale. Between February 28th and March 10th of the same year respondent received $2,500 in trust to pay creditors of Simon, as the purchase price of said groceries and fixtures. On…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Foster v. President of the Essex BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
- Brainard v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Hassie v. God is with Us CongregationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Donohoe-Kelly Banking Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Marshall v. WentzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re American Fidelity CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
- Golden v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Van Orden v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Fredericksen v. HarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Samuels v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.