Legal Opinion

Rapozo v. Better Hearing of Hawaii, LLC

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2009No. 27602PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) erred in concluding that the findings of fact (findings) of the district court of the fifth circuit (the court) to the effect that (1) hearing aids purchased by Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee Mervyn Rapozo (Petitioner) were “nonconforming” under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 481K-1 (Supp. 2007) of HRS chapter 481K, the Assistive Technology Warranty Act (the Act) and that (2) Respondent/Defendant-Appellant Better Hearing of Hawaii, LLC (Respondent) had a reasonable opportunity to repair the devices pursuant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Briones v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Camara v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Shimabuku v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rapozo v. Better Hearing of Hawaii, LLCHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. BrownColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Davis v. Four Seasons Hotel Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Davis v. Four Seasons Hotel Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CollinsHawaii Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API