Salt Lake Hardware Co. v. Chainman Mining & Electric Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada
In Equity. Suit to establish and enforce a mechanic’s lien.
1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge
(orally). This is a suit brought under the provisions of the mechanic’s lien laws of Nevada (Cutt. Comp. Laws, § 3881 et seq.) to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon defendant’s mill and mines situate in White Pine county, Nev. In its claim of lien the complainant states that on March 15, 1901, “this lien claimant and said Chainman Mining & Electric Company made and entered into a certain contract in writing, wherein and whereby this lien claimant agreed and undertook to furnish certain mill machinery and material, and construct and install the same into a mill for said Chainman Mining &…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Salt Lake City v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Davis v. AlvordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Mining Co. v. CullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Skyrme v. Occidental Mill & Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1873
- Cary Hardware Co. v. McCartyColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Westmoreland Manganese Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1955
- White v. Constitution Mining & Milling Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Pioneer Mining Co. v. DelamotteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
- Holtzman v. BennettNevada Supreme Court · 1924
- Gaston v. AvansinoNevada Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.