Legal Opinion

White v. Constitution Mining & Milling Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1936No. 6224PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

The appeals herein seek to determine the priorities in certain property of the Constitution Mining and Milling Company, hereafter referred to as the mining company, as between labor lien claimants, White, Neault, King and Golsong, and an attaching creditor, Wilson.

Chronologically stated, the facts leading up to the time of the taking of the appeals in the instant suit disclose the following situation: The mining company was the owner of mining property in the Coeur d’Alene Mining District in Shoshone County, consisting of a group of contiguous, patented and unpatented mining claims, worked as…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlvordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Mining Co. v. CullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Stryker v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Malone v. Big Flat Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Chamberlain v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dybvig v. WillisIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Credit Suisse AG v. Teufel Nursery, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Chief Industries, Inc. v. SchwendimanIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. D.H. Blattner & Sons, Inc. v. N.M. Rothschild & Sons, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. First Security BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API