Legal Opinion

Bovee v. Yamamoto

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1922No. 17022PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a chattel mortgage. The Specie Bank of Seattle, one of the defendants, answered and asserted a superior right to the property by reason of a mortgage to it upon the same property. The trustee in bankruptcy for one Seiji Yamamoto filed a complaint in interven*518tion, claiming the right to the property covered by the mortgages. The trial to the court without a jury resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment sustaining the claim to the property which was asserted by the Specie Bank. From this judgment the plaintiff and intervener…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCravey v. RemsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Wisconsin Acceptance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. McCall v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. First Minneapolis Trust Co. v. FosseenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Trans West Co. v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  5. Christensen v. Plymouth Collateral Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API