Hatchard v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, President Judge:
Two appeals, which we consolidated and heard together, are before us. In one appeal, the trial court granted appellee Lefkoski’s motion to compel production of a reporter’s notes and other documentary material, as well as filmed “outtakes;” 1 in the other the trial court granted appellee Hatchard’s motion to compel production of outtakes, but denied his request for other documentary material. Appellants argue that these orders are erroneous because all the material is privileged under the Pennsylvania Shield Law, 42 Pa.C.S. § 5942(a),2 as construed in In re Taylor, 412…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hatchard v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re ScheidmantelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- L.B. Foster Co. v. Charles Caracciolo Steel & Metal Yard, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Sprague v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Morgan v. McPhailSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.