Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rojas-Lozano v. Google, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 3, 2016No. Case No. 15-cv-03751-JSCPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE’S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER RULE 12(B)(6) FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge

“CAPTCHAS,” typically distorted words that website visitors are required to identify before accessing certain internet services, are ubiquitous. Their stated purpose is to ensure that the website user is a human. Google’s reCAPTCHA program sometimes requires the user to transcribe two words. The first word serves the security purpose, but Google utilizes the user’s transcription of the second to assist with Google’s digitalization of books; in…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Ponomarenko v. ShapiroDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  3. Arora v. GNC Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. Bush v. Rust-Oleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  5. C.W. v. Epic Games, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API