Legal Opinion

Bush v. Rust-Oleum Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 4, 2021No. 3:20-cv-03268Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 ANTHONY BUSH, individually and on Case No. 20-cv-03268-LB behalf of others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 DISMISS v. 14 Re: ECF No. 29 RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 This is a consumer-products mislabeling case. On behalf of a class of California consumers, 19 the plaintiff challenges defendant Rust-Oleum’s labeling of its KRUD KUTTER cleaning products 20 as “non-toxic” and “earth friendly,” contending that the products in fact…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Williams v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API