Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Fliegelman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 9, 1945PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henderson, S.

This is an application under section 206-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act.

The petitioner, Pauline Fliegehnan, is the widow of the decedent. In this proceeding she requests the court to direct the executors to deliver to her twenty United States Savings Bonds, Series E, registered in the name of “ Mr. Saul Fliegelman or Mrs. Pauline Fliegehnan ”. She also seeks the delivery of a bankbook representing a bank account in the Manufacturers Trust Co. in the sum of $203.76, in the joint names of the decedent and the petitioner.

The United States Savings Bonds form no part of the estate of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Belfanc v. BelfancAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. In re the Estate of DeyoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
  3. Belfanc v. BelfancNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Brumer v. BrumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  5. In re the Accounting of EkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Succession of TannerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Rasmussen v. Oshkosh Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In re the Accounting of BarlettaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  4. In re the Estate of BraunNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  5. In re the Estate of SimonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API