Legal Opinion

State v. Dallmann

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2000No. S-99-1411PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellant, Duane D. Dallmann, was convicted of possession of a controlled substance. On appeal, Dallmann argues that police officers stopped his vehicle as a pretext to search for drags, that various searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights, that he was not given Miranda warnings, and that his sentence is excessive.

Although the substantive issues raised on appeal are significant, this appeal also requires us to address whether a poverty affidavit that fails to state the nature of the action and that the appellant is entitled to redress is sufficient under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2301.01…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. DraganescuNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. BlakeNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. CaddyNebraska Supreme Court · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API