Legal Opinion

Cary v. Manfull

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1930No. 1621PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Justice.

Replevin proceedings in the Justice Court, to recover some articles of furniture, were instituted by Mrs. J. A. Cary, plaintiff and respondent, against Gardner Manfull, defendant and appellant, each party claiming ownership of the property involved. The defendant having in that trial succeeded, the case was appealed by the plaintiff to the District Court of Albany County, where it was tried de novo before the court without a jury. Judgment being given in favor of the plaintiff, the adverse party has brought the record here by direct appeal for review.

The controversy grew out of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Phillips v. MeilySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  2. Diven v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Simanovich v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Miller v. MorineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Stickney v. HughesWyoming Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Arch Sellery, Inc. v. SimpsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Barlage v. Key Bank of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Redland v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Robbs v. Illinois Rural Rehabilitation Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API