Legal Opinion

In Re: Estate of Harold E. Rood

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 28, 2015No. 1648 MDA 2014PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

WECHT, J.:

The Estate of Harold Rood, David Rood, and Jane Elizabeth Lantz (respectively, “the Estate,” “Rood,” and “Lantz”; collectively, “Appellants”) appeal the orphans’ court’s September 4, 2014 order, which determined that two “payable on death” Vanguard investment accounts (“the Accounts”) opened by Harold Rood (“Decedent”), which named Rood and Lantz as beneficiaries of the Accounts upon Decedent’s death, were subject to the spousal election of Hope Rood, Decedent’s wife (“Wife”), pursuant to 20 Pa.C.S. § 2203. Appellants contend that the orphans’ court erred in determining…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Malt Beverages Distributors Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Tarlo's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Scanlon's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rellick-Smith, S. v. Rellick, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Brown, F. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Re: Trust Under Deed of D. Kulig Apl of Budke, C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Grabowski, M. v. Carelink CommunitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Cobbs, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API