Legal Opinion
City of Hayward v. Mohr
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 1958No. Civ. 17800PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRAZIL, J. pro tem. *
Appellant, Mrs. Mohr, is the owner of a 108-acre parcel of land just south of the city of Hayward, and immediately north of Middlefield subdivision. In December 1950, the appellant by indenture conveyed an easement to the Middlefield Company, which at that time was opening up a subdivision in unincorporated territory right next to Mrs. Mohr’s property. The easement covered a strip of land 25 feet wide across the southwesterly corner of the Mohr parcel, and it was for the construction, maintenance and operation of a sewer line and drainage ditch. The area embraced within…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Friesen v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Balestra v. ButtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. San Pedro Boat WorksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Kazi v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Long Beach Unified School District v. Dorothy B. Godwin California Living Trust, and Mobil Oil Corporation, Powerine Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- K & K Food Services, Inc. v. S & H, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.