Legal Opinion

Williams v. Farrior

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 7, 2004No. 1:03cv519Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Keenan Williams, a federal inmate incarcerated at the Federal Corrections Complex in Petersburg, Virginia (“FCC Petersburg”), filed this pro se Bivens 1 action alleging that defendants 2 violated his due process and Privacy Act rights in their application of the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (“IFRP”). Defendants responded to the complaint by filing a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Williams, afforded ample opportunity to file responsive materials pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir.1975),…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API