Legal Opinion
State v. Clark
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 1961PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendant appeals from a conviction of rape. The record contains ample evidence to sustain the conviction. Error is assigned to the giving of the following instruction:
“At the beginning of this trial you obligated yourselves by your oaths to well and truly try the matter at issue between the State of Oregon and Delvin Robert Clark and a true verdict give according to the law and the evidence as given you upon the trial of this case.
“You have heard the evidence and it now becomes the duty of the Court to instruct you as to the law applicable to the matter under consideration. The jury is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. LindenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. BeggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- State of Oregon v. CahillOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Commonwealth v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- State v. WederskiOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. BettsOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. FosterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.