Legal Opinion

Conant v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 29, 2017No. 3:16-cv-02290-HZPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Plaintiff Roy B. Conant, appearing pro se, brings this voting rights action against Kate Brown, Governor of the State of Oregon, and Ellen Rosenbaum, Oregon’s Attorney General. In an Amended Complaint filed December 27, 2016, ECF 14, Plaintiff dropped the State of Oregon as a Defendant and added then-Secretary of State Jeanne Atkins as a Defendant. Because Plaintiff asserts his claims against Defendants in their official capacities, Am. Compl. 2, ¶¶ 2a-2c, and because Dennis Richardson is now Oregon’s Secretary of State, I construe the claims as being…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lyman v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  2. League of United Latin America v. Gregory ACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  3. Lyman v. BakerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  4. Kennedy v. HatfieldDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  5. Lupo v. Tennessee Secretary of State Tre HargettDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API