Legal Opinion

Toboni v. Pennington Millinery Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 1959No. Civ. 18230PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Plaintiff has appealed from two orders requiring her to furnish security to the defendants pursuant to the provisions of section 834 of the Corporations Code: A $500 surety bond to defendants Pennington Millinery Company, Sibyl E. Pennington Amante and Walter A. Spence, and a $500 surety bond to defendants Tom Cooney Company and Tom Cooney individually.

In support of her appeal plaintiff claims: (1) This is not a Corporations Code. (2) The affidavit of one Wright in support stockholder’s derivative suit within the meaning of section 834, of the Amante-Spence-Pennington…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sutter v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Beyerbach v. Juno Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Campbell v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Erlich v. GlasnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Star Motor Imports, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Fairchild v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Brusso v. Running Springs Country Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Starbird v. LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API