Legal Opinion

Beebe v. Scott's Bluff County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1912No. 16,850PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Scott’s Bluff county: Hanson M. Grimes, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff while traveling upon a public road or highway, by reason of the failure of the defendant county to maintain the road in a reasonably safe condition for the public use. On the trial in the district court for Scott’s Bluff county, the plaintiff had the verdict and judgment, and the defendant has appealed.

The record discloses that the higlnvay or public road in question was established some time about the year 1893, and has been in use by the public ever since that time. It is situated on the section line…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bartram v. Town of SharonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  2. Langhammer v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Bell v. Village of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Harris v. Inhabitants of Great BarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Moore v. Inhabitants of AbbotSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1850

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Perrotti v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Bosqui v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bady v. DetwilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. King v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API