Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Stanton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 21, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Spain, J.P.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 22, 2000, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.
The record establishes that during the applicable benefit *699periods, claimant co-owned a store where customers could purchase and paint plaster figurines. The certificate of doing business and the insurance coverage were in claimant’s name as was the business’s checking account. Claimant often appeared at the store during the relevant benefit periods and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Claim of ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Claim of Di GiacomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re the Claim of OursAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of BrenenstuhlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re the Claim of BerzonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of AlmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of AlbarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of KansuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of SalomoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006