Legal Opinion

Phy v. Allen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The defendant assigns error of the trial court in denying his application for a change of judges. The affidavit of prejudice is not brought into the record by a bill of exceptions in conformity to the requirement of the opinion in Shaughnessy v. Kimble, 106 Or. 484, 487 (212 Pac. 483, 213 Pac. 135). The affidavit is not authenticated in any manner by the trial judge, or otherwise, except by being contained in the abstract of record.

Passing this question, the affidavit of prejudice was filed, or was claimed to be filed, by the defendant after the trial judge had ruled upon the demurrer and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Henry v. HarkerOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Home Banking & Realty Co. v. BaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. Smith v. TatumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Circuit CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State v. StilwellOregon Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Forte v. PageOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Hammons v. EnglishOregon Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API