Legal Opinion

Hammons v. English

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The common counts are permitted in code pleading: Bliss on Code Pleading, §§ 156, 157, 157a, 298 and 299; Phillips on Code Pleading, § 367; Pomeroy on Code Remedies, §§15 and "436 — 8; Clark on Code Pleading, pp. 196-204; Bancroft’s Code Pleading, §§41, 42 and 913. The complaint alleges the performance of services, the date, the defendant’s written request, the value, a written promise to pay and nonpayment. Under the authorities we believe that the foregoing was sufficient to meet the demands of the common counts. In Bowen & Chambers v. Emmerson, 3 Or. 452, the complaint did not allege a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sutherlin v. BloomerOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Anderson v. Wallowa National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Henry v. HarkerOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Bowen v. EmmersonOregon Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Waite v. WillisOregon Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maine v. GarvinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API