Legal Opinion

In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 257 Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 2002No. 300A02PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF CENSURE

The Judicial Standards Commission (Commission) notified Judge Craig B. Brown (respondent) on 2 January 2001 that it had ordered a preliminary investigation to determine whether formal proceedings under Commission Rule 9 should be instituted against him. The subject matter of the investigation included allegations that in the summer of 1998 respondent entered two orders ex parte dismissing the DWI charges against the defendant in State v. Ronald Taborn, *279Durham County file nos. 83 CR 24987 and 86 CR 41630, when respondent knew each of the two cases were before him only on a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. In Re HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re BadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 278, BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. IN RE BRASWELLSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. IN RE BROWNSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  5. In re BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API