Legal Opinion

In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 278, Braswell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 13, 2004No. 556A03PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF CENSURE

The Judicial Standards Commission (Commission) notified Judge Jerry Braswell (respondent) on 11 March 2002 that it had ordered a preliminary investigation to determine whether formal proceedings under Commission Rule 9 should be instituted against him. The subject matter of the investigation included allegations that respondent presided over a hearing in the case of R. Walt Willingham and Nathaniel Willingham v. Interbay Funding, L.L. C. and David Craig as substitute trustee on 22 January 2002 in Onslow County when the plaintiff in that case had an unrelated lawsuit pending…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Lange v. LangeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. FieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. In Re HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Com. v. Dip, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Com. v. Dip, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Moslem v. GarlandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API