Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Harrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1992No. 484A91PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The Judicial Standards Commission (Commission) notified Judge Allen W. Harrell on 19 October 1990 that it had ordered a preliminary investigation to determine whether formal proceedings under Commission Rule 7 should be instituted against him. The subject matter of the investigation included allegations that the respondent improperly involved himself in State v. Wadell Williams and State v. Virginia Williams by attempting to dissuade the investigating officer from pursuing the investigation and bringing charges against the defendants and by seeking an opinion from the Attorney General’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 76, KivettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 44, MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 132, BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 253 StephensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  3. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 238 BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 257 BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 153, MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API