Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Beers v. Jeson Enterprises

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 1, 2000No. 97C-892419, 97C-892420 CA A102004 (Control), A102005Published

1ConcurrenceEdmonds, J.

According to the majority, the sending of two copies of a single demand letter does not entitle plaintiff to an award of attorney fees on more than one action under ORS 20.080(1).11 agree. The statute is aimed at notifying putative *729defendants so they can settle when the amount sought is $4,000 or less. The majority then holds that plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees on one action under the statute even though plaintiff subsequently filed two separate actions for $4,000 each that were eventually consolidated for trial. It reasons that, even without consolidation, plaintiff would have been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. SunderlandOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Rodriguez v. the Holland, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Johnson v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Steele v. a & B Automotive & Towing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Guy F. Atkinson Corp. v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API