Legal Opinion
Newcomb v. Daniels, Saltz, Mongeluzzi & Barrett, Ltd.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 4, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-1757PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERRY, Chief Judge.
This case concerns a dispute over attorney’s fees charged by the defendant for legal services rendered to the plaintiffs in connection with a personal injury suit. The defendant seeks a change of venue. The plaintiffs oppose the change of venue and seek summary judgment on their claims.
I. BACKGROUND
The defendant is the law firm of Daniels, Saltz, Mongeluzzi & Barrett. The firm represented the plaintiffs, Ann and Bruce New-comb, in their lawsuit arising from Mr. New-comb’s December 1, 1989 industrial accident in Trenton, New Jersey. (Affidavit of Bruce Newcomb.)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Ness v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Tischio v. Bontex, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Job Haines Home for the Aged v. YoungDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- LG Electronics Inc. v. First International Computer, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Liggett Group Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Eagan Ex Rel. Keith v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.