State v. Aponte
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case comes before us pursuant to an order that directed the defendant to appear and show cause why the issues raised in his appeal should not be summarily decided. After hearing oral argument and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that the issues should be summarily decided.
The defendant, Robert Aponte, appeals from a judgment of conviction of assault with intent to rob and of possession of a weapon not a firearm entered in the Superior Court after a trial by jury. We affirm the judgment of conviction. The facts…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. CaruoloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
- State v. FennerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
- State v. GrundySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
- State v. JenisonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by25 opinions
- State v. OliveiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- State v. FritzSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- State v. PatelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- State v. SilviaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- State v. RodriquezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.