Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Air Lines, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) brought this action to enforce an administrative subpoena against United Air Lines, Inc. (“UAL”) in the course of its investigation into charges of national origin and sex discrimination filed by a UAL flight attendant, Maureen Droge. The district court enforced the subpoena in its entirety. UAL appealed, and we now affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
I
BACKGROUND
A. Facts
Ms. Droge began working for UAL as a flight attendant in 1990. In 1995, she requested, and was granted, a temporary assignment in Paris,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blue Bell Boots, Inc., Formerly J. W. Carter Company v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Fortino v. Quasar Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Nyunt v. TomlinsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- McLane Co. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Applicant-Appellee v. Sidley Austin Brown & WoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kronos Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- U.S. International Trade Commission v. ASAT, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.