Anderson v. Litke Family Ltd. Partnership
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, J.:
¶ 1 Appellants appeal from an order and decree nisi, entered by the Court of Common Pleas, Centre County, that denied their attempt to eject appellees from a tract of land. We affirm.
¶ 2 The trial court summarized the factually tortuous case as follows:
In 1794 Joseph J. Wallis allegedly surveyed two separate blocks of warrants now located in Curtin Township, Centre County. These blocks have come to be known as the “Reese block” and the “Davis block.” It is [appellants’] contention that the Reese and Davis blocks were contiguous in 1797 and remain contiguous. It is the contention…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doman v. BroganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Behar v. FrazierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Bellas v. CleaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
- Northumberland Coal Co. v. ClementSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Mineral Railroad & Mining Co. v. AutenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
3Cited by12 opinions
- Croyle v. DellapeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Company Image Knitware, Ltd. v. Mothers Work, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Terwilliger v. KitchenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Manack v. SandlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Beckwith MacHinery Co. v. Asset Recovery Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.