Legal Opinion

Manack v. Sandlin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 2002PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraci, J.

¶ 1 Appellant David Sandlin appeals from a judgment order in one of two cases consolidated for purposes of appeal. 1 For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment entered at AR-01-003888 and AR-01-005427.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. AR-01-003888

¶ 2 The first case at issue is a landlord/tenant action in which the district justice entered judgment against the Appellant/tenant, David Sandlin (Sandlin) for rental arrears in the amount of $8,030.78. Sandlin appealed and Appellee/landlord Robert Manack (Manack) was ruled to file his complaint within twenty days. Manack timely filed his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. ColeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Commonwealth v. KleinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Yentzer v. Taylor Wine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Kubik v. Route 252, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Greenville Gastroenterology, SCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Voracek v. Crown Castle USA Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. BowmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Estate of Rosemary EmerySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. AHRCO-Monview v. Eubanks, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API