Legal Opinion

Union Carbide Corp. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1992No. 91-116PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 5739.02(B)(15) excepts from the sales tax a manufacturer’s purchases:

“ * * * of machinery [and] equipment * * * for use in packaging tangible personal property produced for sale * * *. Packages include * * * cartons, crates, boxes, * * * and other similar devices and containers and ‘packaging’ means placing therein.” (R.C. 5741.02[C][2] makes the same exception from the use tax.)

In analyzing the applicability of this exception we “ * * * focus upon the distinct function of each item of tangible personal property subject to assessment and its relationship to” the packaging process. Bird &…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bird & Son, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Kroger Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newfield Publications, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Newfield Publications, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API