Legal Opinion

Loomis v. Armstrong

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1883PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Newaygo. Appeal from order upon administrator’s accounting. The lieir brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Loomis, as heir at law of his deceased ■father Henry Loomis, took measures to compel an accounting from Armstrong the administrator, and in the probate *524court for Newaygo a finding was made of a balance due from the administrator of $1454.81, which he was ordered! to pay over to the widow and heir equally.

The administrator appealed, and as his sole reason for appeal set up this finding as incorrect, because he claimed there was a balance due himself of $724.31, that being the sum shown by his account as presented there.

The account in the probate court charged the administrator with the receipt…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heath v. WatersMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Gott v. CulpMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Wildey v. Fractional School District Number OneMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Heap v. HeapMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Perrin v. LepperMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. In re to Appoint a Guardian for StorickMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Senneff v. HealySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Porter v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API