Legal Opinion

D-Con Co., Inc. v. Allenby

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 13, 1989No. C 89 0332-FMSPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERN M. SMITH, District Judge.

Plaintiff, d-Con Company (d-con), moves for partial summary judgment, seeking a declaratory judgment that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. § 136 et seq., (FIFRA), preempts defendants from imposing warnings under California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act, better known as Proposition 65 (Prop 65). Plaintiff also challenges Prop 65 on Commerce Clause grounds, but did not address that claim in this motion.

Defendants filed a cross-motion for partial summary judgment and a motion to transfer the case to the Eastern…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Meat Institute v. LeemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Hurt v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990
  3. Terminix International Co. v. Tennessee Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  4. Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Ass'n v. AllenbyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1990
  5. Terminix International Co. v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API