Legal Opinion

Ridder Bros., Inc. v. Strassburger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1943No. Appeal, 216PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Plaintiff brought this action in assumpsit to recover on quantum meruit for services rendered by plaintiff for defendant.

The plaintiff’s statement set forth that defendant under an oral contract requested the advice and assistance of plaintiff with respect to certain investments which defendant had made in various newspapers, and claimed for the services the sum of $5,000.

Defendant, in his affidavit of defense, denied any contract, denied that any services were performed, and alleged that the amount claimed savored of attempted extortion.

At the trial the jury returned a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robbins v. WeinsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Hanley v. WaxmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Philadelphia v. Neill & Lincoln Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Ryder v. JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardt v. Heller Bros.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Hardt v. Heller Bros.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Levit v. Kutcher, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API