Legal Opinion

Levit v. Kutcher

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided January 25, 1996No. 5373Published

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDMAN, J.,

Defendant Susan Kutcher, pro se, appeals this court’s denial of her post-trial motions. The case arises out of a breach of contract action between defendant Kutcher and plaintiff Saul Levit, Esquire. Plaintiff Levit initiated this suit in August 1990, in which he alleged that Kutcher had failed to pay the legal fees due to him and his firm Schnader, Harrison, Segal and Lewis for services that he and his colleagues in the family law section of the firm rendered to Ms. Kutcher in her litigation against her ex-husband to win a modification of their child custody agreement: she sought…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Ingrassia Const. Co., Inc. v. WalshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Hershey Foods Corporation v. Ralph Chapek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  5. LaRocca EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API