Legal Opinion
Marvin K. Hammon v. Sharon Pratt Kelly
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 17, 1993No. 92-7067PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge WALD.
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs are a class of individuals certified by the district court. The notice of appeal specifies the parties taking the appeal as: “Marvin K. Hammon, et. al.” Mayor Kelly and the District of Columbia challenge this court’s jurisdiction because of the plaintiffs’ failure to specify the party taking appeal pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 8(c). Plaintiffs respond that Fed.R.App.P. 3(c)’s strictures do not apply to class action suits. We hold that Fed.R.App.P. 3(c) requires the notice of appeal,…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Barry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gilbert Rendon, Cross-Appellant. And Joe Mike Zepeda, Intervenor-Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants v. At & T Technologies, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- John F. "Jack" Walsh v. Ford Motor Company, Appellee-MovantCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Hammon v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
4Cited by9 opinions
- Brooks v. CelesteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Hammon v. KellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Robert Griffith v. Louis M. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Hammon v. KellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Hammon v. KellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.