Legal Opinion
Carlyle Towers Condominium Ass'n v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 30, 1997No. 1:96-cv-02462PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
BLOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring suit against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) in its capacity as the receiver for Crossland Savings Bank, FSB (“Crossland”), which was closed by the United States Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) on January 24, 1992. Plaintiffs seek to hold the FDIC liable, pursuant to the Financial Institution Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”), Pub.L. No. 101-73, 108 Stat. 183, for damages pertaining to the construction of Carlyle Towers, a 370-unit condominium building (the “Towers”) located in New Jersey…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Robinson v. Overseas Military Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Heirs of BoisdoréSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carlyle Towers Condominium Association, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Carlyle Towers Condominium Ass'n v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Nickols v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998