Legal Opinion
Nickols v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 9, 1998No. 3:96CV1895(GLG)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
This slip-and-fall case is brought by plaintiff, Marylu Nickols, as Conservatrix for Ernest Nickols, Jr., against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver for First Constitution Bank, alleging negligence in the maintenance of the property where Mr. Nickols fell. Because the claim is against the FDIC, plaintiff was required to exhaust administrative remedies before bringing this action in federal court. See RTC v. Elman, 949 F.2d 624, 627 (2d Cir.1991); Carlyle Towers Condominium Ass’n, Inc. v. FDIC, 982 F.Supp. 181, 183…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McIntosh v. AntoninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Serge Marquis v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidating Agent of Hillsborough Bank & Trust Company, Eltrex International Corporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidating Agent of Hillsborough Bank & Trust Company, Michael M. Mills v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Nashua Trust Company, James P. Goodrich v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Dartmouth BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kareem v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Miguelachuli v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011
- Feldman v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Kareem v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011