Legal Opinion
Deihl v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 22, 1993No. CV 92-5907(T)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TASSOPULOS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand seeking reversal or remand of the decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services denying his applications for disability insurance and Supplemental Security Income (hereinafter “SSI”) benefits. Defendant, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, has filed a Cross Motion for Summary Judgment seeking affirmance of her decision denying plaintiffs applications for benefits.
Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties filed a Consent to Proceed Before…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Elizabeth J. HAMMOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis BOWEN, Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Robert H. DESROSIERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Miguel GONZALEZ, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant/AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Keyes v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ziff v. ChaterDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
- LaPierre v. CallahanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1997