Legal Opinion

Ziff v. Chater

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 28, 1996No. C-94-3968-VRWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER.

WALKER, District Judge.

Plaintiff has filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of defendant’s denial of his application for social security disability insurance (“SSDI”). Pending before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons described below, the court GRANTS defendant’s motion and DENIES plaintiffs motion.

I

A

On January 27, 1992, plaintiff filed an application for SSDI benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Plaintiffs application was denied, denied again upon reconsideration and denied once again by an administrative law…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mary M. MAGALLANES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Wanda S. FLATEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Patricia GREENSPAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McQuestion v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
  2. LaPierre v. CallahanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API